Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T21:57:50.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluometuron adsorption to vegetative filter strip components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. Brooks Blanche
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Joseph H. Massey
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
M. Boyette
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
M. Cade Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Research on best management practices, including vegetative filter strips, is needed to evaluate the potential for reducing herbicides in surface runoff. Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the influence of different filter strip components on fluometuron adsorption. Samples were taken from a switchgrass filter strip (1-m wide) established on a Brooksville silty clay. Sampled components included switchgrass stems clipped to 4 cm, plant residue on the soil surface, and topsoil < 5-mm, 0.5- to 1-cm, 1- to 3-cm, and 3- to 5-cm deep. The filter strip topsoil samples contained 1.8, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.8% organic matter for the aforementioned depths, respectively, compared with 1.8% in soil collected from an adjacent cropped area. Fluometuron adsorption on each sample was compared at initial concentrations of 0.017, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg L−1, the last of these representing four times the peak concentration in surface runoff. Fluometuron adsorption was greater in soil from filter strip areas than in soil from cropped areas. Averaged over concentration, the soil–water partition coefficient (Kd) value for soil 1- to 3-cm and 3- to 5-cm deep was greater than the value for soil from the cropped area. Stems and residue had Kd values 4.9- and 4.1-fold greater, respectively, than soil from the cropped area. Average adsorption coefficients normalized for organic carbon content (Koc) of soil < 5-mm and 3- to 5-cm deep from filter strip areas were greater than the values for soil from cropped areas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Fluometuron. Pages 135137 in Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Angers, D. A., Bissonnette, N., Legere, A., and Samson, N. 1993. Microbial and biochemical changes induced by rotation and tillage in a soil under barley production. Can. J. Soil Sci. 73:3950.Google Scholar
Arora, K., Mickelson, S. K., Baker, J. L., Tierney, D. P., and Peters, C. J. 1996. Herbicide retention by vegetative buffer strips from runoff under natural rainfall. Trans. ASAE 39:21552162.Google Scholar
Arshad, M. A., Schnitzer, M., Angers, D. A., and Ripmeester, J. A. 1990. Effects of till vs. no-till on the quality of soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22:595599.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L. and Laflen, J. M. 1979. Runoff losses of surface applied herbicides as affected by wheel tracks and incorporation. J. Environ. Qual. 8:602607.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L., Laflen, J. M., and Johnson, H. P. 1978. Effect of tillage systems on runoff losses of pesticides, a rainfall simulation study. Trans. ASAE 21:886892.Google Scholar
Baughman, T. A., Shaw, D. R., Webster, E. P., and Boyette, M. 2001. Effect of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) tillage systems on off-site movement of fluometuron, norflurazon, and sediment in runoff. Weed Technol. 15:184189.Google Scholar
Benoit, P., Barriuso, E., Vidon, P., and Real, B. 1999. Isoproturon sorption and degradation in soil from grassed buffer strip. J. Environ. Qual. 28:121129.Google Scholar
Brown, B. A., Hayes, R. M., Tyler, D. D., and Mueller, T. C. 1994. Effect of till and cover crop on fluometuron adsorption and degradation under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 42:629634.Google Scholar
Carter, M. R. and Mele, P. M. 1992. Changes in microbial biomass and structural stability at the surface of a duplex soil under direct drilling and stubble retention in North-Eastern Victoria. Aust. J. Soil Res. 30:493503.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. M. and Lipe, W. M. 1992. Water quality and agriculture: Mississippi experiences. J. Soil Water Conserv. 47:220223.Google Scholar
Coupe, R. H., Thurman, M., and Zimmerman, L. R. 1998. Relation of usage to the occurrence of cotton and rice herbicides in three streams of the Mississippi Delta. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:36733680.Google Scholar
Dabney, S. M., McGregor, K. C., Meyer, L. D., Grissinger, E. H., and Foster, G. R. 1993. Vegetative barriers for runoff and sediment control. Pages 6070 In Mitchell, J. K., ed. Integrated Resource Management and Landscape Modification for Environmental Protection. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Darding, R. L. and Freeman, J. R. 1968. Residual phytotoxicity of fluometuron in soils. Weed Sci. 16:226229.Google Scholar
Day, P. R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. Pages 562565 In Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Debolt, D. C. 1974. A high sample volume procedure for the colorimetric determination of soil organic matter. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Analy. 5:131137.Google Scholar
Essington, M. E., Tyler, D. D., and Wilson, G. V. 1995. Fluometuron behavior in long-term tillage plots. Soil Sci. 160:405414.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Murray, M. R., and Harwig, N. L. 1989. Herbicide leaching and distribution in tilled and untilled soil. J. Environ. Qual. 18:439445.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Harper, S. S. 1991. Metribuzin degradation in soil: I—effects of soybean residue amendment, metribuzin level, and soil depth. Pestic. Sci. 31:221237.Google Scholar
McLean, E. O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. Pages 199209 In Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Misra, A. K., Baker, J. L., Mickelson, S. K., and Shang, H. 1996. Contributing area and concentration effects on herbicide removal by vegetative buffer strips. Trans. ASAE 39:21052111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, L. E. and Vogel, K. P. 1995. Switchgrass, big bluestem and indian-grass. Pages 409410 In Barnes, R. F., Miller, D. A., and Nelson, C. J., eds. Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Moorman, T. B., and Snipes, C. E. 1992. Effect of concentration, sorption and microbial biomass on degradation of the herbicide fluometuron in surface and subsurface soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:25172522.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1997. Effects of vegetative filter strip width on reducing fluometuron and norflurazon losses in surface runoff. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 214. Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pages 561562 In Page, A. L., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Rankins, A. Jr., Shaw, D. R., Boyette, M., Kingery, W. L., and Smith, M. C. 1999a. Herbicide and sediment losses in runoff as affected by perennial grasses. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:193.Google Scholar
Rankins, A. Jr., Shaw, D. R., and Shankle, M. W. 1999b. Phytotoxic effects of selected herbicides on perennial grasses used as filter strips. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 39:173174.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Gaston, L. A. 1997. Tillage and cover crop effects on cyanazine adsorption and desorption kinetics. Soil Sci. 162:510–509.Google Scholar
Savage, K. E. and Wauchope, R. D. 1974. Fluometuron adsorption-desorption equilibria in soil. Weed Sci. 22:106110.Google Scholar
Shankle, M. W., Shaw, D. R., Kingery, W. L., Boyette, M., and Rankins, A. Jr. 1998. Influence of best management practices on fluometuron degradation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:229230.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R., Blanche, S. B., Shankle, M. W., Kingery, W. L., and Massey, J. H. 2000. Environmental fate of fluometuron in soil influenced by best management practices (BMPs). Pages 159166 In Ball-weber, J. A., ed. Proc. Miss. Water Res. Conf. Mississippi State, MS: Water Resources Res. Inst. Google Scholar
Tingle, C. H., Shaw, D. R., Boyette, M., and Murphy, G. P. 1998. Metolachlor and metribuzin losses in runoff as affected by width of vegetative filter strip. Weed Sci. 46:475479.Google Scholar
Tollner, E. W., Barfield, B. J., Haan, C. T., and Kao, T. Y. 1976. Suspended sediment filtration capacity of simulated vegetation. Trans. ASAE 19:678682.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. 1993. Weed control strategies and impact of their withdrawal. Pages 2127 in The Importance of Pesticides and Other Pest Management Practices in U.S. Cotton Production. Natl. Agric. Pestic. Impact Assess. Prog. Rep. 1-CA-93. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1986. Soils, herbicide sorption and model plant-soil systems. Pages 174179 In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1996. Impact of vegetative filter strips on herbicide loss in runoff from soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:662671.Google Scholar
Weill, A. N., de Kimpe, C. R., and McKyes, E. 1988. Effect of tillage reduction and fertilizer on soil macro- and microaggregation. Can. J. Soil Sci. 68:489500.Google Scholar
Willian, W. T., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., Bridges, D. C., and Snipes, C. E. 1997. Norflurazon adsorption and dissipation in three Southern soils. Weed Sci. 45:301306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L. G. 1967. Sediment removal from flood water. Trans. ASAE 10:3537.Google Scholar